Inmate Work
and Unstructured Time
Some of the most surprising results came from questions about inmate work and unstructured time. Some of these activities, which are often singled out in "tough on crime" rhetoric, are not as distasteful to the public (or the press) as some believe. If there were significant differences in responses by gender, they were noted.
Now I'm going to ask you some questions about what typical inmates might do and have access to while in STATE prison. |
||||
Do you think the typical inmate is required to work while in prison? | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Do Inmates Work? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Yes | 459 | 56.20% | 173 | 51.00% |
| No | 357 | 43.80% | 166 | 49.00% |
| Total Cases | 816 | 100.00% | 339 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 186/27
The majority of inmates are not paid for work they perform. Do you approve or disapprove of them working while in prison? | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Should Inmates Work? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Approve | 857 | 95.90% | 343 | 96.30% |
| Disapprove | 36 | 4.10% | 13 | 3.70% |
| Total Cases | 893 | 100.00% | 356 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 109/10
More than half of the respondents of both surveys (56.2%/51.0%)
know that inmates must work in prison, and even when told that
most inmates are not paid for the work they perform, most 95.9%/96.3%
still approve of inmates working in prison. (Only inmates on work
release and those who work for Prison Rehabilitative Industries
and Diversified Enterprises (PRIDE) are paid wages. Their employers,
not the state, pay those on work release.)
Seventy-eight percent of the inmates in prison in Florida on the
last day of the fiscal year (June 30, 1997) worked, participated
in programs such as vocational or academic classes or substance
abuse treatment classes, or a combination of work and programs.
The remaining 23 percent were either located at private prisons,
were either physically unable to work, were going through the
reception and orientation process or were in some type of confinement
for management purposes, including death row. The following
highlights some of the types of work Florida prison inmates participated
in during FY 96-97 (from July 1, 1996 to June 30, 1997), and how
much it saved Florida taxpayers.
New Construction, Renovation and Repair
Inmates spent more than 3.5 million hours performing work in new construction, correction of fire safety deficiencies, and repairs and renovations during FY 96-97. Major construction projects were conducted at 25 major institutions and almost every other institution had some construction going on. The value of this labor is estimated at $30.9 million based on a benefited hourly rate of $8.71*.
Community Work Squad Program
There are two types of Community Work Squads: those that work under an agreement with the Department of Transportation (DOT) and those who work under a local agreement between correctional institutions and agencies such as the Division of Forestry, cities, counties, municipalities and non-profit corporations. The latter are called Public Works/Interagency Community Service Work Squads.
In FY 96-97, the DOT inmate work squads, working under the supervision
of staff from both the DC and DOT performed more than 1.9 million
hours of work valued at more than 12.9 million. These squads
performed all types of roadway and right-of-way work to help maintain
the state's highway system. They also assisted the DOT following
natural disasters such as hurricanes and severe storms that created
extensive damage to several areas in the state.
The Public Works/Interagency Community Service Work Squads are
authorized by s. 946.40, F.S. During FY 96-97, these inmate work
squads performed more than 3.5 million hours of free labor
at a value of $29.9 million dollars (labor is valued at $8..31
per hour*). The types of work performed by these squads includes
roadway and right-of-way work for cities and counties, grounds
and building maintenance, mowing, litter removal, painting, construction
projects, structure repair, office moving and cleaning up our
state forests. These squads also assisted both state and local
governments in cleaning up after natural disasters.
The total value added/cost savings generated by the Community Work Squad Program for FY 96-97 was $42.8 million. Total program costs were $19.3 million, resulting in a net value added/cost savings to Florida taxpayers in the amount of $23.5 million.
Farm and Gardening Programs
During FY 95-96, 68 facilities participated in the farming and gardening program. This program provides almost 500 work stations for inmates and involves approximately 300 acres. Inmate's prepare the soil, plant seeds, hoe weeds and harvest and process the vegetables. This year, inmates produced about 5 million pounds of vegetables with a wholesale value of $2.5 million.
Department of Juvenile Justice Construction Project
In June 1996, inmates at Hendry C.I. and Work Camp began construction of a 32-bed wilderness camp and a 30-bed halfway house for the Department of Juvenile Justice that is now complete. The value of this work is captured under the Public Works Squad/Interagency Community Service work squads section.
Guide Dogs
Inmates at the Gainesville Work Camp are part of a program called Inmates Providing Animal Care and Training (IMPACT). Since 1991, inmates have been involved in raising guide dogs for the Southeastern Guide Dog Association in Palmetto, Florida. The inmates work with these animals for the first 10-12 months focusing on basic obedience training. This not only provides a free training ground for the non-profit corporation, but allows the inmates to earn certificates for training in canine behavior, nutrition and grooming, which gives inmates a head start on a job in dog training and care when they are released. Once the dogs complete their training they are returned to the Association for additional training and placement.
Division of Blind Services
Inmates at Tomoka C.I. and Daytona Community Correctional Center (CCC) assist the Division of Blind Services in several areas. Daytona CCC inmates work at the Bureau of Braille and Talking Books Library Service, which is the regional library for the southeastern United States, where they inspect, rewind, sort and file tapes and books, package orders in preparation for shipping and set up meeting rooms. Tomoka C.I. inmates record magazines, textbooks and other literature, make copies, print notices and newsletters, clean, repair and refurbish tape players, and repair Braille machines.
Aquaculture Program
The department has established an aquaculture program at Hendry C.I. to raise and harvest freshwater fish for consumption by inmates. Inmate labor is used in site preparation and maintenance as well as taking care of the fish until harvesting.
Do you think the Florida State Prison System uses Chain Gangs? | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Do Chain Gangs Exist? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Yes | 358 | 50.10% | 168 | 51.50% |
| No | 356 | 49.90% | 158 | 48.50% |
| Total Cases | 714 | 100.00% | 326 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 288/40
Do you approve or disapprove of the use of Chain Gangs? | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Should Chain Gangs Exist? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Approve | 605 | 73.30% | 248 | 74.70% |
| Disapprove | 221 | 26.70% | 84 | 25.30% |
| Total Cases | 826 | 100.00% | 332 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 176/34
Survey respondents are evenly split (50.1%/51.5%) with regard to knowing whether or not the DC employs the use of chain gangs. Regarding approval or disapproval of the use of chain gangs, most (73.3%/74.7%) of the respondents from both surveys indicate approval; however, it is noted that all survey respondents are not aware of the level of dangerousness or security risks presented by the use of chain gangs and the high custody and supervision level required of inmates assigned to these work squads. Respondents to the general public survey indicating approval of the use of chain gangs were evenly split between men and women; however, the majority of respondents disapproving the use of chain gangs were women.
The department utilizes restricted labor squads (chain gangs) at seven correctional institutions: Apalachee Correctional Institution (CI) - East Unit, Gulf CI, North Florida Reception Center - West Unit, Cross City CI, Marion CI, South Florida Reception Center and Polk CI. On March 31, 1997, a total of 177 close custody inmates were assigned to these work squads. These squads work outside the secure perimeter of the institution on institutional property under the armed supervision of Correctional Officers. The inmates are shackled individually at the ankles and are not connected to each other in any manner for reasons of security and safety.
Every day the DC requires 3,000 inmates, who do not require the same level of supervision as inmates assigned to chain gangs, to work in the department's Community Work Squad Program for municipalities, cities, counties, state agencies (such as the Department of Transportation and Division of Forestry), and non-profit organizations. During fiscal year 1995-96, these work squads provided a total value added and cost savings in excess of $21 million dollars to the state of Florida. (See previous survey question for more details.)
The start-up cost for one chain gang is $152,717, with recurring costs in excess of $100,000 per year. The squad requires three staff with a maximum staff-to-inmate ratio of one to up to 10 inmates depending on the type and location of the work. When working inmates inside the secure perimeter of an institution, the DC can reduce staff involved and increase the number of inmates supervised. In this latter instance, the staff-to-inmate ratio is one to up to 25 inmates, again dependent on the type and location of the work. Also, when working in this situation, the start-up and recurring costs are less than $40,000 per year.
Do you think they have access to TV? | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Inmate Access to TV? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Yes | 813 | 93.80% | 333 | 95.10% |
| No | 54 | 6.20% | 17 | 4.90% |
| Total Cases | 867 | 100.00% | 350 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 135/16
Do you approve or disapprove of them having access to TV? | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Should Inmates Have TV? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Approve | 428 | 49.40% | 235 | 69.50% |
| Disapprove | 439 | 50.60% | 103 | 30.50% |
| Total Cases | 867 | 100.00% | 338 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 135/28
A total of 93.8% of the general public respondents and 95.1% of the press respondents know that inmates have access to television. The general public are almost evenly divided in their approval and disapproval of television access by inmates (49.4% to 50.6%), but the news media respondents favor television for inmates by 69.5%.
Most prisons have televisions available for viewing when they are not working or attending educational programs. The televisions are located in large dormitory dayrooms for group viewing. Most of the DC's televisions were paid for by proceeds from sales to inmates from the inmate canteens. However, state law now prohibits the purchase of televisions for recreational purposes.
Do you think they have access to weights while in prison? (i.e., for weight training/lifting weights) | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Inmate Access to Weights? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Yes | 772 | 93.20% | 317 | 91.60% |
| No | 57 | 6.80% | 29 | 8.40% |
| Total Cases | 829 | 100.00% | 346 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 173/20
Do you approve or disapprove of them having access to weights? | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Should They Have Weights? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Approve | 417 | 48.80% | 224 | 64.70% |
| Disapprove | 437 | 51.20% | 122 | 35.30% |
| Total Cases | 854 | 100.00% | 346 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 148/20
The majority of respondents (93.2%/91.6%) are correct in believing that inmates have access to weightlifting equipment. The general public is almost evenly divided in their attitude toward inmates having access to weightlifting equipment, but again, the news media has a much more favorable view (64.7%).
Once an inmate completes his required work or school assignments, and if the inmate has remained free of disciplinary problems, he or she is allowed time for wellness activities. If an inmate has remained free of disciplinary problems for 120 days, these activities may include weightlifting. Exercise and activity programs are a component of the DC's security program because inmates with unstructured time are a threat to the safety and security of an institution.
Do you think the typical inmate is housed in an air-conditioned prison? | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Inmates Have Air Conditioning? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Yes | 677 | 87.70% | 227 | 70.30% |
| No | 95 | 12.30% | 96 | 29.70% |
| Total Cases | 772 | 100.00% | 323 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 230/43
Do you approve or disapprove of them having air conditioning? | ||||
| General Public | News Media | |||
| Should Inmates Have Air Conditioning? | Number | Percent | Number | Percent |
| Approve | 571 | 66.90% | 249 | 74.60% |
| Disapprove | 283 | 33.10% | 85 | 25.40% |
| Total Cases | 854 | 100.00% | 334 | 100.00% |
Cases Not Applicable = 148/32
The majority of the general public (87.7%) and to a lesser degree, the press (70.3%) believes the typical inmate is housed in an air- conditioned prison. This is incorrect. However, 66.9% of general public respondents and a surprising 74.6% of news media respondents approve of air-conditioning for inmates. One of the biggest misconceptions about prisons is that inmates are housed in air-conditioned cells or dormitories. In fact, only seven of the DC's 55 major institutions have air-conditioning, excluding five contract facilities. Contract facilities are privately owned and therefore the DC does not control their construction or management. Of the seven DC facilities with air-conditioning, only portions of them are air-conditioned, not the entire facility. These prisons were built in the 1970s or were built by the former Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) for juvenile justice programs. These facilities are Brevard Correctional Institution (CI), Broward CI, Dade CI, Hillsborough CI, Lancaster CI, Union CI, and Corrections Mental Health Institution (CMHI). Union CI was built in 1913 and has since been renovated with air-conditioning in some areas, such as its hospital. CMHI houses mentally ill inmates.